They Did Not Die or Disappear in Vain
January 21, 2006 at 4:47 am | In Human and Civil Rights | Leave a Comment
By Senator Nene Pimentel
Minority Leader
Philippine Senate
I thank Mayor Lito Atienza and the organizers of this assemblage for kindly inviting me to speak before you this morning.
On this day, September 21, 34 years ago, our democratic institutions were devastated by the imposition of martial law all over the land.
Thousand killed or disappeared
Thousands were arrested without cause. Thousand were killed without legal reason. Thousands disappeared without trace under the brutal regime.
We are gathered here to honor those who died or disappeared in our struggle for the restoration of our freedoms in the dark days of martial rule.
Mayor Atienza does well to inscribe their names on this wall of stone. Otherwise, there will hardly be a public and concrete reminder of their selfless sacrifices on the altar of liberty.
Chameleons of history
Often as history records in many a country after victory is won in a people’s fight for their rights against oppression, some of the oppressors like chameleons change colors to enjoy with the victors the fruits of the struggle. Worse, hypocritically, they would now make the people believe that they had always been defenders of the rule of law, upholders of the civil liberties and protectors of human rights.
I appreciate that Mayor Atienza wants the fallen and the disappeared freedom fighters remembered regardless of their station in life. And so it is that you have the names of the unknown along with the famous; the socially unconnected with the socially pedigreed; the voiceless with the vocal written on this wall.
Common bond
Naturally, we read the names of Ninoy Aquino, Macliing Dulag, and Edgar Jopson in the Memorial Wall.
But, alongside these well known victims of martial rule, we also read the names of Salvador Santos, Roy Lorenzo Acebedo, and Enrique Romero, people whose identities hardly ring a bell in the public’s memory.
There is reason for the mixing of the great and the ordinary people who are named in the Wall. The reason is that the same bond bound them together in the people’s quest for the reinstitution of our rights and liberties. And that bond they have cemented by the common shedding of their blood so that others may live and the risking of their liberty so that others may have freedom.
Freedom over dictatorship
These are the heroes who chose democracy over dictatorship; constitutionalism over one-man rule; the rule of law over the rule of the gun.
It is time as Mayor Atienza urges all of us to recall those who fell in the struggle or who disappeared involuntarily in the search for the restoration of our people’s freedoms.
By following the mayor’s wise counsel, credit is given where credit is due.
By doing so, we give meaning to the struggle that they had waged against martial law.
By honoring the martial law dead and the disappeared, we are saying that they did not die in vain.
And by our collective presence here today we are sending a message for the world to hear: never again to dictatorial rule but, yes to the rule of law; never again to oppressive leaders but, yes to freedom, justice and peace for our people.
Thank you.
(Remarks of Sen. Nene Pimentel at the inauguration of the victims of martial law memorial wall on September 21, 2006 at the Mehan Gardens, Manila)
Victims of Martial Law Memorial Wall is a project of the City of Manila under the leadership of Mayor Jose L. Atienza, Jr.
Today: September 21, 2006
January 21, 2006 at 4:35 am | In Human and Civil Rights | Leave a CommentBy Mr. Rey De Guzman
Chairman
Research, Issue and Advocacy Commission – KALIPI
A couple of decades ago, a historical proclamation were enforced to the entire Filipino nation. It would be the precursor to thousands of death, the military take over and political chaos of gigantic proportions.
MARTIAL LAW!!!
I never had the chance of experiencing first hand the hardships of those dark days. But through the accounts of my parents, close relatives and various documentaries about Martial law, Imelda, the Marcos Administration and ill-gotten wealth, the Desiparasidos (individuals who disappeared during the martial law regime), Yamashita treasure, the Golden Buddha, and EDSA, I believe I had a clear picture of living in the martial law era.
It was TOUGH, It was FRIGHTENING and it was DANGEROUS.
No human rights was respected nor honored, people can be innocently taken for police questioning and never be seen again. Students are watched, monitored for any destabilizing mass actions. Business and industries can be taken from its rightful owners in a whimsical snap of a finger.
NO FREEDOM!
To speak out and air protest is a kiss of death. To gather in a group for whatever purpose is providing the police license to arrest and harass you. No news, no television, no broadcast unless approved by the Marcos government.
It was a time that demanded silence, conformity and surrendered ignorance. No questions, no explanations just follow… OR BE DEAD.
It is that glaring picture of democratic death that sets me ablaze. I can’t believe it happened! Here at my beloved country… that there was a time when freedom and democracy was dead. It is unimaginable but it is true.
Come to think of it, it was in the dark days of the Martial Law that we had learned to stand as a people and value the gifts of democracy. It was a reminder that freedom is our right, a right we must value and protect. I remember Ninoy Aquino’s statement:
“The only thing for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing!”
To enjoy the fruits of democracy, we must be ready to protect it from people or entities with vested interest. The system of democracy can only work if people are vigilant to protect their individual freedom and the nation’s welfare.
It is in this light that i joined KALIPI. It is the principle of vigilantly protecting democracy that ignites me to passionately pursue voluntary work for youth development. It is my commitment to give my share to the community. To pass on the lessons and value of democracy, that no one may forget the pains of Martial Law and more importantly the lessons of EDSA!
originally posted from Hakuna Matata (Not)
Young Asians and Contemporary Liberalism in Asia
January 10, 2006 at 8:10 am | In Liberal Values & Ideologies | Leave a Commentby: Rachel Ann Bersemera
Many Western experts on Democracy and Liberalism often claim that Asia has a short history with the liberal Ideology. Asian liberals in general however would counter that contrary to this observation, Asia has a long and rich history of liberal-democratic movement.
Of course, this may not be the kind that highlights individualism or the type that emphasizes the right to self-realization of the individual over collective or familial aspirations, but it is liberalism in the many eyes of Asians nonetheless.
This differentiation with Western against Asian conception of Liberalism has preoccupied much of the debates amongst liberals for the past three decades. This even became more pronounced when Asian Tigers such as Singapore and Taiwan (during Martial Rule), practicing their own brand of “democracy”, monumentally achieved status as first-world countries without the marked inequality usually identified with first-world liberal-capitalist economic growth.
While recognized to be rooted in Confucian ideology, the Asian Way of thinking is traditionally perceived to encompass almost all of Asia. And despite the initial pronouncements of its timely demise during the Asian Financial Crisis, it continues to persist and thus far successfully resist various attempts to discredit both its successes and significance.
Indeed, the meat of contention has always been while majority of those in the West have always identified liberalism’s core concept of freedom with individuality and individual choice, traditions in the East have always put emphasis on the role of the individual in the group and harmony.
The Asian way, therefore, sees the gain of the collective as the gain of the individual as well. The crux of the debate is that this line of thinking is supposed to be contradictory to traditional liberalism’s accentuation on individual freedom. Many Asian liberals, especially the contemporary ones would beg to differ of course for this interpretation somehow dilutes Asia’s rich history on past and present struggles for democracy and freedom.
Nonetheless, it is also these same new breed of liberals that recognize the need for the Asian Way to adapt to the dictates of the times. The information and communications technology revolution, the command of financial and economic liberalization, the march of democratization in the region, and most importantly, the rise to power and prominence of many of Asia`s youths in the region has led to the rethinking of the Asian Way that has always been credited to have made possible the Asian economic miracle.
It is at this crucial juncture, when Asia’s version of liberal-democracy is at crossroads, that liberal youth organizations such as the Young Liberals and Democrats of Asia (YLDA) are expected to perform the vital role of strengthening the liberal components of Asia’s distinct brand of liberalism.
Being at the forefront of what Samuel Huntington has referred to as Third Wave Democratization, countries in Asia like the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand , Taiwan, and Malaysia stand first among equals in determining the fate of liberalism in the region. It is not just a coincidence that liberal youths from these countries together with their counterparts in Nepal, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Singapore , Burma, and Cambodia took the initiative of steering the region’s youths towards embracing liberal values and virtues in the face of some traditions and practices opposed to liberalism.
YLDA taking on this huge responsibility is made more noteworthy by the fact that in some countries where YLDA member organizations are located, democracy is either fragile or not practiced. The courage of these youths emanates from the unnerving stance of their Asian brothers and sisters who fought martial law, dictatorship, and authoritarianism in the past.
And while most succeeded and some have yet to see the fruition of their sacrifices, Asia’s youth’s unified struggle against undemocratic and tight-fisted rule serves as an inspiration to the present crop of young liberals and democrats of Asia to remain steadfast in their liberal-democratic commitment.
Indeed, despite having faced tremendous challenges to democratic institutions in the past, Asian liberal youths draw their strength not only from the communal experience of the past but more so, on the toils of the present Asian freedom fighters all across the region.
That many of our parents have fought for the majority of the present young generation to be free is no longer enough motivation for many young Asians. Today, young liberals and democrats of Asia uniformly raise their voice for liberalism and democracy for their friends and their families who continue to be denied of their freedom and liberty. Fulfilling this oath of support founded on unbreakable bonds of friendships makes fulfilling the mission of spreading liberalism and democracy truly more rewarding.
In seeing the youths as the new torchbearers of liberal democracy in the region, YLDA understands that success comes with changes in perception and practice of liberalism in Asia. The Asian way of thinking marginalizing the rights of individuals for example must give way to modern liberal democratic principles of human rights, freedom, equality, and justice. However, while YLDA accepts that the past must pass away, the new may not be ready to be born yet.
Hence, peaceful and collective struggles and not violent or extra constitutional means shall give birth to contemporary liberalism in Asia. And for this to come to pass, YLDA believes that preparation and labour has to go together.
It is for this reason that YLDA has been concentrating its efforts for the past three years equipping its member organizations and ultimately, the liberal youth public in Asia with relevant skills and tools that the young generation of Asian need in constructing soft and hard institutions aimed at improving their platform for responsible governance, publicity, fundraising, and networking.
The two most recent YLDA workshops held in Sri Lanka and Malaysia on fundraising and on Information and Communications Technology, respectively, underscore this thrust of the federation on the importance of training, education, and network. YLDA is also to implement for the first time capacity-building visits to member organizations to help in organizing youths for liberal discussions and education.
Taking their lessons from the past and taking cues from the trends offered by the future, YDLA aims to fuse the rich tradition of democratic struggles in the region with new technology and practices for a perfect ingredient of successful liberal advocacy. And while in some areas the soil may be arid for cultivation of liberal ideology, YLDA believes that Asian liberal youths will be successful by combining inspiration with perspiration.
Armed with idealism and commitment to serve, nothing can obscure the Asia ’s youth’s burning desire to be free — and to free the friends who are not. This is the brand of liberal democratic tradition YLDA commits itself. Gone were the days when freedom and liberty stop at the doorsteps of national borders.
As Asians, YLDA takes as an obligation to make sure the fruits of past struggles are not only safeguarded, but also promoted and broadened. As a federation of young liberal Asians, YLDA takes the responsibility of making young Asians understand that no amount of economic development, whether genuine or superficial, can be exchanged for one’s right to be free. And while many of the countries in Asia have adopted the liberal democratic framework of governance, it is the task of young liberals and democrats of Asia to make certain that this adoption is significantly substantive both in paper and in practice.
It is the right of every Asian to be free and thus; it is the duty of every Asian to make every Asian free. This is the only kind of Asian liberalism YLDA accepts as true. This is the new Asian Way YLDA binds itself to.
Rachel Ann Cruz Bersamera is the youngest member of the Executive Committee of Young Liberals and Democrats of Asia and is part of the Interim Board of the Kabataang Liberal ng Pilipinas (KALIPI) – Council of Ladies, the Women Youth Wing of the Liberal Party in the Philippines . She used to be the former Public Relation Officer of KALIPI. She is currently finishing her undergraduate degree on Public Administration and Governance at the Polytechnic University of the Philippines .
Unveiling the Filipino Liberal
January 10, 2006 at 7:22 am | In Liberal Values & Ideologies | Leave a CommentBy Marlowe C. Selecios
Our predominantly conservative society undeniably looks with suspicious eyes on the Filipino liberal. Driven by his unusual zeal for individual liberty and social equality, the liberal is typecast as an activist, rarely appreciated and often misunderstood. The liberal’s excesses are frequently magnified and highlighted, while his virtues, which are aplenty, understated. His pronounced impatience with the status quo is seen as rebelliousness. His self-confidence is mistaken for arrogance.
But the Filipino liberal is impatient without being rebellious. True, he is dissatisfied with the socio-economic condition of the nation. He is appalled by the seeming helplessness of the masses debilitated and sickened by grinding poverty. He too senses the growing discontent of the people and is angered and shamed by the endless corruption in government. But unlike many conservatives who preach understanding and even tolerance, the Filipino liberal demands change and action. He does not call for arms like the radicals. He calls for genuine reforms. He does not espouse violent revolution as a solution. But he preaches a revolution of individual attitudes.
This relentless and penetrating quest for solutions and alternatives is a hallmark of every liberal. Like Dr. Jose Rizal before him, the Filipino liberal courageously presents society’s problems, asks the difficult questions, and proposes bold solutions. Courage is his most cherished virtue. Often alone in a society resistant to change, the liberal always finds the audacity to speak his mind. Sometimes people heed his call. At other times, however, people call for his crucifixion.
Rizal himself drew inspiration from the great liberal movements of Europe. Harassed by an abusive government and horrified by the great inequalities of his society, Rizal pressed for meaningful reforms. Realizing strength in numbers, Rizal worked with the other Filipino intellectuals who, like him, were stirred and awakened by the fiery and brilliant writings of Voltaire, Montesquieu and Rousseau, and thus began perhaps the greatest liberal struggle in Philippine history. Rizal was of course crucified for his beliefs. But the liberal ideals of individual liberty, equality of opportunity, and limited government found a new birth and home in Filipino soil.
The Filipino liberal is an eternal optimist. While others consider this trait a weakness the liberal sees it as his strength. As an optimist, he believes that life is preponderantly good. Sure, he sees evil everywhere and among the greatest of them are corruption and poverty. He acknowledges the successive failures of Philippine governments in fully addressing them. But he believes that every new Filipino generation provides a hope and a promise of a more spirited and gallant struggle. While some people see the government as an enemy, in this historic and defining battle the liberal regards it as an ally.
An efficient government run by honest and progressive leaders can become a vital cog for action that could energize society in the fight against poverty and corruption. This is a core belief of the Filipino liberal and thus completely distinguishes him from the radicals who advocate an overthrow. Liberals are wary of revolutions which almost always lead to tyranny or a slip in to anarchy. In effecting meaningful reforms, the liberal believes in working within not outside the system. Like Ninoy Aquino, Jovito Salonga, and Gerry Roxas, leading lights during the dark days of martial rule, the true liberal always acts within the parameters of the law no matter how great the temptation to do otherwise. He neither espouses nor welcomes violence. He may be an outspoken critic, a bearer of new ideas, a bold advocate but never a rebel.
The liberal relishes lively discourses and intellectual debates. He is happiest when discussing and deliberating new policies and proposals. Free speech is the most esteemed of freedoms. The pen is his most powerful weapon. He believes that an open society, where there is a free exchange of ideas, stimulate people to think boldly and creatively. Thus an integral part of the liberal advocacy is the full flowering of the Filipino’s civil and political rights. Consequently, the Filipino liberal is most effective when he is most free.
Perhaps the greatest misconception is the assertion that one cannot be at once liberal and a Christian. This is unfortunate for religious freedom and tolerance is one fruit of many a libertarian struggle. Liberalism and Christianity are not opposing philosophies. Thus it is not anomalous for liberals to profess and advocate the Christian virtues of honesty, humility, charity and prayerfulness. Liberals find strength and solace in their faith. It is therefore not surprising to find that the most courageous of Filipino liberals are also often the most deeply religious. But the liberal also believes that each man must be free to worship his own God, if he chooses to worship at all.
Ultimately, however, the liberal is measured by the effectiveness of his response to corruption and poverty, the twin evils of Philippine society. The people are increasingly becoming restless. A social volcano is heating up. The Filipino liberal must once again prove that he is up to this mounting generational challenge. Already his voice can be heard in the streets, in the universities and in the halls of Congress calling for genuine political and social reforms. His cries for a more sustainable economic policy and a stricter anti-corruption strategy are beginning to stir and energize the indifferent. His agenda is varied and comprehensive stretching from education reforms and environmental protection to land redistribution and population control. But so much more still needs to be done. His calls at times fall on deaf ears but his voice remains true and powerful. Some people remain doubtful of his motives. But he remains steadfast, confident and unafraid. For he is a liberal and, like his forebears, he will succeed!
Wretched
January 4, 2006 at 7:32 am | In Education | Leave a CommentBy Dennard D. Dacumos
Camila can hardly wait another year to finish her undergraduate degree program in a state-run university. She stopped going to school for six months to work as a full-time customer service representative in a call center. Both her parents were laid out from work so she had no other choice but to find a job and earn big money. She has plans to go abroad and settle with her family there eventually.
Is Camila being selfish or has she been a victim of an education that conditions the mind of its recipients to apply their knowledge somewhere else but here? ‘Education for the masses’ is what the government aims in allotting a huge chunk of budget to the country’s education sector. But let us not forget that ‘education for the masses’ should be rooted into a system of ‘quality education’. ‘Quality education’ must not only pertain to teaching the best theories, practices and skills to the students. Inculcating the value of nationalism must go along with it too. No wonder the Philippines is suffering from brain drain because we can’t convince our professionals to come back and help our ailing motherland. It is a pity that we are always relying on OFW remittances when what we really need are their advanced abilities and knowledge to help rebuild this nation. RP education prepares its youth to become exports for the world market. At the end of the day, we end up losing more than gaining more.
Will there be more Camilas in the coming years? The answer is probably yes especially when you have a national leader who thinks that a 1:100 teacher-student ratio is the proper way to address the shortage of classrooms. Planning to work in a call center? If you are willing to be employed in a company that doesn’t really need what you studied for four years in college, why not?
SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION IS REAL
January 4, 2006 at 7:24 am | In Reproductive Rights | Leave a CommentBy Joan Armada
Reports say, our generation is highly engage to sexual practices, especially when curiosity among the young arises. Probably, many of these sexually active individuals are enjoying in whatever sense it is. But that does not mean they can not be attacked by sexual disorders, with a simple thought that it is just normal. And you might be one of them. And admit or not, you might be suffering from it.
Sexual disorders may be acquired by physical or sexual abuse, and trauma which can be life-long. These disorders cause personal distress that cannot be solely accounted for by a medical condition but also by situational and generalized cases such as mentioned above. In cases where medical condition is suspected as the underlying cause, sexual problems may be symptomatic of diseases that need treatment like diabetes and neurological treatment.
Likewise, the issue of female sexual dysfunction is controversial, particularly in biological causes, because of fear of being the topic of discussion wherein most of us are afraid to engage in. The American Psychological Association (APA) classifies female sexual problems as mental disorders such as trauma-related aversion to sex. Surveys of women suggest that therapy should focus on women’s physiological needs. Under this view, sexual dissatisfaction is symptomatic of an intimacy problem in which one or both partners fail to communicate their needs. Funny as it may seems, dissatisfaction occur when partners are uneducated or do not uncover physiological problems that impair sensitivity which is necessary for sexual partnership’s success.
Studies document the prevalence of dysfunction among individuals of lower socioeconomic status. Individually, sexuality incorporates family, societal and religious beliefs, and is altered with aging, health status and personal experience. A breakdown in any of these areas may lead to sexual dysfunction.
Some thoughts on SONA 2006
January 4, 2006 at 6:00 am | In Election, Politics &Governance | Leave a CommentBy Rob Ramos
(taken from http://www.phoenixeyrie.blogspot.com/)
What an… interesting SONA.
The President appeared to be in an upbeat mood… and was probably a little bit too excited for her SONA, as she stepped up to give her speech even before the singing of the National Anthem. Whoops. I expect several Protocol Officers to get a really good tongue lashing later, as well this little incident getting blown totally out of proportion by the media and her enemies.
Quite a bit of names congratulated there, and not a few ribbing. She even took a playful jab at Makati Rep. Teddy Boy Locsin.
She rattled off quite a good number of programs, nearly all of it infrastructure in nature: roads, sea and air facilities, railways… In one sense, the construction of all these transportation infrastructure makes sense on a strategic level: roads, rail facilities, seaports and aerodromes are not called “arteries” for nothing. These are the essential pipelines through which a nation’s economy and growth flow through, and development is usually interconnected, pun not intended, with the level of development of such. A bad road usually means less progress coming into a locale, just as a well-paved and maintained highway quite literally speeds up the flow of investments and people into a place.
Of course, as the Prez continued to rattle off all those projects – some of which, she said, are in place already – my mind had one question: where are we going to get the money for all this?
Is that why she started her SONA by saying we not only have money to pay off the national debt, but to build needed infrastructure?
And I don’t think she should have spent the amount of time she did in praising Gen. Palparan. She’s currently under flak for the disappearance and deaths of Leftists; heaping such accolades on the man regarded as the foremost hunter of the Left in the Philippines might not be good PR. People would say she’s sancitoning extra-judicial killings now, straight from her own mouth, even if there really is no proof until now that the military, and Palparan in particular, are behind many if not all of the deaths and disappearances.
It’s also good to see a new guy at the helm of the Senate. I have nothing against a Senate that is indepedent and even critical of the Executive Branch; the principle of the Separation of Powers only holds if all three branches are strong. But, given the context of Frank Drilon’s actions since 8 July 2005, the Senate’s activities appeared to go beyond mere fiscalizing.
Now that a man without (immediate) ulterior motives on the Presidency is at the Senate’s helm, perhaps it would be a more productive one, and not just plain destructively noisy.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.


